Granting legal standing to trees - or nature more broadly - would be revolutionary. It would shift the legal paradigm from viewing the environment as property to recognising it as a rights-bearing entity. But how feasible is it?

The debate over voicelessness in international environmental law centers on a profound moral question: how to ensure justice by defining and upholding responsibilities toward those - human and non-human - impacted by environmental decisions but unable to advocate for themselves.

Is climate change a phenomenon beyond our control?

How do carbon markets influence our relationship with the atmosphere?

How does our preoccupation with the present inhibit effective action to mitigate damage to the environment?

How did the planet become subservient to human needs?